Lawuit blames Boeing for San Francisco jet crash

APTOPIX San Francisco Airliner Crash

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) — Three U.S. families have sued Boeing over the deadly crash of Asiana Airlines Flight 214 at San Francisco International Airport, alleging that coach passengers suffered more serious injuries than business class travelers because of different seatbelt configurations.

The lawsuits filed Thursday in federal court say some coach passengers wearing only lap belts suffered head and spinal injuries that could have been prevented by shoulder restraints available in the more expensive and roomy business class seats toward the front of the plane.

The lawsuits also claim that the South Korean airline failed to properly train its pilots and that the plane’s auto-throttle was inadequate.

Several other lawsuits have been filed on behalf of survivors of the July 6 crash that killed three people and injured 180.

Passengers toward the rear of the Boeing 777 took most of the impact when the plane slammed into a seawall at the end of the runway, breaking off the landing gear and ripping off the tail. The flight was coming from Shanghai and Seoul.

The cases filed Thursday were the first to question the airplane’s seatbelts.

The lawsuits seek unspecified damages from Asiana and Boeing.

Boeing spokesman Marc Birtel has said the Federal Aviation Administration mandates seatbelt setups on planes. Further, Boeing buys its seats and seatbelts from several subcontractors and simply installs them on planes, he said.

The airline industry has said adding three-point seatbelts to airplanes would require major changes to seat design that would mean higher airfares and less comfort.

After treating dozens of survivors, Dr. Geoffrey Manley, neurosurgery chief at San Francisco General Hospital, said he was surprised by a pattern of injuries to coach passengers that showed how their upper bodies were flung forward and then backward over the lap belts that kept them in their seats and undoubtedly saved their lives.

Manley said it was too early to determine if harness restraints would have prevented spinal injuries or simply moved the damage further up patient’s backs.

___

Information from: San Jose (Calif.) Mercury News, http://www.mercurynews.com

blog comments powered by Disqus